Triple Integrals and Change of Variables
Learning Objectives
- Interpret a triple integral as scalar accumulation over an ordinary three-dimensional solid.
- Construct rectangular-coordinate bounds from projections and bounding surfaces.
- Convert between rectangular, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates and use the correct volume Jacobians.
- Compute volume, mass, center of mass, and moments of inertia of solids.
- Select coordinates that simplify a solid's geometry and integrand.
- State and apply the change-of-variables theorem with the absolute Jacobian determinant.
- Compute two- and three-dimensional Jacobians for general transformations.
- Transform non-polar regions, bounds, integrands, and differential elements correctly.
A triple integral accumulates a scalar quantity throughout a three-dimensional region . It does not require a four-dimensional geometric interpretation: is the ordinary three-dimensional volume of , while accumulates the scalar field over that volume.
Triple Integrals over Solids
Triple Integral
For an integrable scalar field over a solid , the triple integral is the limit of sums of the form .
Triple Integral
Scalar accumulation over a three-dimensional solid.
Geometric and physical meanings
- If , then is the 3D volume of .
- If is volumetric mass density, then the integral is mass.
- If is a signed field, positive and negative contributions are accumulated with sign.
Rectangular Coordinates and Bounds Construction
For the order , first project the solid onto the -plane. Describe that projection by and . Then, at each point in the projection, describe the lower and upper surfaces in the -direction.
Typical dz dy dx Setup
A solid bounded vertically by two surfaces.
Constructing Triple-Integral Bounds
- Choose an integration order.
- Project the solid onto the coordinate plane associated with the two outer variables.
- Describe the projected region using valid two-dimensional bounds.
- For each point in that projection, identify the lower and upper surfaces for the inner variable.
- Split the solid if one set of bounds cannot describe it without overlap or omission.
- Perform a dimensional and geometric check before integrating.
Project the solid before setting nested bounds
For the illustrated solid, 0 ≤ x ≤ 2, 0 ≤ y ≤ 2 − x, and 0 ≤ z ≤ 2 − x/2 − y/2. The dashed footprint is the xy projection and a vertical slice identifies the inner z limits. The schematic is not to scale.
Cylindrical Coordinates
Cylindrical coordinates retain the vertical coordinate while using polar coordinates in the -plane. They are especially effective for cylinders, cones, paraboloids of revolution, and solids with circular projections.
Cylindrical Coordinate Relations
Cylindrical Volume Element
Jacobian-scaled volume differential.
for the displayed order. Any consistent permutation of , , and is possible when the corresponding bounds are rewritten correctly.
The factor r is mandatory
The cylindrical transformation inherits the polar area scaling in the -plane, so omitting changes the value and the units of the integral.
Why cylindrical volume includes the factor r
At radius r, the short tangential side is approximately r dθ. Multiplying it by dr and dz gives dV = r dr dθ dz; the order of integration may change only when the bounds are rewritten consistently.
Spherical Coordinates
This course uses for distance from the origin, for the azimuth angle in the -plane, and for the polar angle measured from the positive -axis.
Spherical Coordinate Relations
- , usually ,
Spherical Volume Element
Jacobian-scaled volume differential.
Angle convention
Always verify the convention used by a textbook or software package. Here is measured from the positive -axis; under a different convention the conversion formulas and Jacobian expression may be written differently.
The three side lengths behind the spherical Jacobian
The local side lengths are approximately dρ radially, ρ dφ in the polar direction, and ρ sinφ dθ around the z-axis. Their product yields dV = ρ² sinφ dρ dφ dθ for the lesson's angle convention.
Coordinate-Selection Strategy
Coordinate-selection guide
- Use rectangular coordinates when bounding planes and coordinate-aligned boxes dominate.
- Use cylindrical coordinates when , circular projections, cones about the -axis, or surfaces dominate.
- Use spherical coordinates when spheres centered at the origin, cones , or radial expressions dominate.
- Prefer the system that simplifies both the region and the integrand; a symmetric region alone does not guarantee the simplest integral.
- Check that the angular and radial bounds cover the solid exactly once.
Mass, Center of Mass, and Moments of Inertia
Let denote volumetric mass density.
Mass of a Solid
Integral of volumetric density.
First Moments
Moments about the coordinate planes.
Center of Mass
Density-weighted average position.
Moments of Inertia of a Solid
Integrate squared perpendicular distance to each axis.
The Change-of-Variables Theorem
A coordinate transformation changes both the description of the region and the local size of area or volume elements. The Jacobian determinant measures this local scaling. The absolute value is used for ordinary area and volume integrals because area and volume are nonnegative measures even if the transformation reverses orientation.
Two-Dimensional Theorem
2D Change of Variables
Let be a continuously differentiable one-to-one transformation on a region (up to standard boundary exceptions), with nonzero Jacobian in the interior. If , then
2D Change-of-Variables Theorem
Transform a double integral using the absolute Jacobian determinant.
2D Jacobian
Determinant of the derivative matrix.
Transform the whole problem
A correct change of variables requires all four pieces: region, bounds, integrand, and differential element. Computing a Jacobian alone is not a complete transformation.
Three-Dimensional Theorem
3D Change of Variables
Let be a suitable one-to-one continuously differentiable transformation from to . Then
3D Change-of-Variables Theorem
Transform a triple integral using the absolute 3D Jacobian determinant.
3D Jacobian
Determinant of the 3 by 3 derivative matrix.
Familiar coordinate systems are change-of-variables formulas
- Polar coordinates have .
- Cylindrical coordinates have .
- Spherical coordinates have under the convention used here.
Bounds under a General Transformation
If the standard axes are awkward, transform the entire problem together. This route checks region data, coordinate coverage, the forward Jacobian, and the final bounds before evaluation; unresolved geometry remains a hold rather than an invented limit.
Triple-Integral Bounds and Coordinate Transformation
Specify the solid, choose coordinates that simplify the geometry and integrand, transform the complete integral, and verify one-time coverage
Start with solid E and field f → Record E, f and the requested quantity; Record E, f and the requested quantity → Is region data sufficient for bounds?; Is region data sufficient for bounds? — No → Resolve missing solid or field data; Is region data sufficient for bounds? — Yes → Are rectangular bounds simple?; Project E to set rectangular bounds → Do the slices cover E exactly once?; Do the slices cover E exactly once? — Yes → Evaluate and report bounds and order; Do the slices cover E exactly once? — No → Split E into pieces with single-valued limits; Split E into pieces with single-valued limits → Do the pieces cover E exactly once?; Do the pieces cover E exactly once? — Yes → Sum the piece integrals; report bounds; Do the pieces cover E exactly once? — No → Hold: resolve gaps or overlaps; Transform E and f; include r or ρ² sin φ → Do radial/angular bounds cover E once?; Do radial/angular bounds cover E once? — Yes → Evaluate; report coordinates and bounds; Do radial/angular bounds cover E once? — No → Hold: revise radial or angular bounds; Define T:S→E and compute |det DT| → Are T, Jacobian and coverage valid?; Are T, Jacobian and coverage valid? — Yes → Integrate (f ∘ T)|det DT| over S; Are T, Jacobian and coverage valid? — No → Hold: verify the map and coverage; Are rectangular bounds simple? — Yes → Project E to set rectangular bounds; Are rectangular bounds simple? — No → Do cylindrical or spherical coordinates simplify both?; Do cylindrical or spherical coordinates simplify both? — Yes → Transform E and f; include r or ρ² sin φ; Do cylindrical or spherical coordinates simplify both? — No → Define T:S→E and compute |det DT|
- Start with solid E and field f: terminator
- Record E, f and the requested quantity: input output
- Is region data sufficient for bounds?: decision
- Resolve missing solid or field data: document
- Are rectangular bounds simple?: decision
- Project E to set rectangular bounds: process. Choose an integration order, project E onto the outer-coordinate plane, and write the iterated limits for each slice.
- Do the slices cover E exactly once?: decision
- Split E into pieces with single-valued limits: process. Make the pieces nonoverlapping before integrating; then verify their combined coverage.
- Evaluate and report bounds and order: document
- Do the pieces cover E exactly once?: decision
- Hold: resolve gaps or overlaps: document
- Sum the piece integrals; report bounds: document
- Evaluate; report coordinates and bounds: document
- Hold: revise radial or angular bounds: document
- Hold: verify the map and coverage: document. Check one-to-one regular patches and valid bounds, or choose a different transformation.
- Integrate (f ∘ T)|det DT| over S: document. State the map, transformed region, bounds, and complete integral setup.
- Transform E and f; include r or ρ² sin φ: process. Compare cylindrical and spherical coordinates, transform the boundaries and integrand, and use the matching volume Jacobian.
- Do radial/angular bounds cover E once?: decision
- Define T:S→E and compute |det DT|: process. Transform the surfaces, region, and integrand using the forward Jacobian determinant.
- Are T, Jacobian and coverage valid?: decision
- Do cylindrical or spherical coordinates simplify both?: decision
General Transformation Workflow
- Identify combinations of that repeatedly appear in the region or integrand.
- Define new variables so those combinations become simple coordinate lines, planes, or constants.
- Solve for the old variables in terms of the new variables when practical.
- Transform every boundary equation and determine the new region.
- Compute the correct forward Jacobian or , or use the reciprocal of the inverse Jacobian where valid.
- Insert the absolute value of the Jacobian determinant.
- Evaluate and check units, sign, and order of magnitude.
Forward versus inverse Jacobian
If you compute instead, then where the transformation is locally invertible,
Do not use the inverse determinant without taking the reciprocal.
The absolute Jacobian preserves positive area under orientation reversal
The map T(u,v) = (2u + v, u − v) has determinant J = −3. It reverses orientation, but sends a unit square of area 1 to a parallelogram of area 3, so the area factor is |J| = 3.
- A triple integral accumulates a scalar field over ordinary three-dimensional volume; is the volume of .
- Cylindrical coordinates use and spherical coordinates use under this topic's angle convention.
- Mass, center of mass, and inertia follow from integrating density times the appropriate lever-arm factors.
- Coordinate choice should simplify the region and integrand together.
- The change-of-variables theorem transforms the region, integrand, bounds, and differential element and uses the absolute Jacobian determinant.
- General two- and three-dimensional Jacobians extend the same scaling idea seen in polar, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates.
References
- OpenStax, Calculus Volume 3, §5.4: Triple Integrals
- OpenStax, Calculus Volume 3, §5.5: Triple Integrals in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates
- OpenStax, Calculus Volume 3, §5.6: Calculating Centers of Mass and Moments of Inertia
- OpenStax, Calculus Volume 3, §5.7: Change of Variables in Multiple Integrals